RFC-035: Mediation Vector Profile — A Validity-Aware Measurement Model for Domains of Concern — 8. The Four-State Variable Model
AIGP Specification › RFC-035: Mediation Vector Profile — A Validity-Aware Measurement Model for Domains of Concern › 8. The Four-State Variable Model
← 7. Core Definitions · Section index · 9. The Gap Calculus →
8. The Four-State Variable Model
Each variable in a Mediation Vector carries four states:
| State | Meaning | AIGP Source |
|---|---|---|
| Anticipated | What should be true (declared before execution) | ANTICIPATE criteria |
| Actual | What was observed or measured from execution-time system behavior, before determining whether the supporting evidence is admissible | RECORD, TRACE, STEP_COMPLETE observation |
| Evidenced | The value supportable from admissible, retained, provenance-bound evidence | D-DNA signed artifacts, grader outputs |
| Perceived | What the user, operator, or organization believes | FEEDBACK signal, human assessment |
8.1 Actual Is Not Metaphysical Truth
The “actual” state is not a claim about what really happened in some absolute sense. Empirical systems do not access truth directly — they access observations. The actual state is the execution-time observed value, recorded before admissibility is determined.
The distinction between actual and evidenced is deliberate and load-bearing:
Something may have happened, but the system may not be able to prove it happened.
- Actual state = what the system observed at execution time (may rest on unsigned, stale, or low-provenance signals)
- Evidenced state = what the system can defend from admissible, provenance-bound evidence
The distance between them is the Measurement Gap (§9.2) — the signal that something was observed but cannot be proven to the required admissibility level.
A variable is therefore represented as:
variable = { anticipated_state, // from ANTICIPATE — what should be true actual_state, // execution-observed — what was seen (pre-admissibility) evidenced_state, // from admissible D-DNA evidence — what can be proven perceived_state // from FEEDBACK / human — what is believed}8.2 State Population Rules
| State | Population Trigger | Required Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Anticipated | ANTICIPATE message sealed | Criterion assertion from Domain of Concern template |
| Actual | Execution observed | System observation at execution time, prior to admissibility check |
| Evidenced | Admissible evidence chain available | Provenance-bound artifact meeting the variable’s min_admissibility_level |
| Perceived | FEEDBACK received OR human assessment recorded | User signal, reviewer judgment, organizational claim |
Actual state is the execution-observed value. Evidenced state is the best value supportable from admissible evidence — which may be lower-confidence than, equal to, or absent relative to the actual observation. Perceived state represents claims, assumptions, user feedback, or organizational understanding.
← 7. Core Definitions · Section index · 9. The Gap Calculus →