RFC-027: IHL-Aligned Governance — Protected Persons and Humanitarian Context — 9. Context Activation Protocol
AIGP Specification › RFC-027: IHL-Aligned Governance — Protected Persons and Humanitarian Context › 9. Context Activation Protocol
← 8. References · Section index · 10. Context Phases and Transitions →
9. Context Activation Protocol
9.1 Authority to Declare
The humanitarian_context declaration is a privileged operation — not all actors may legitimately invoke IHL protections.
| Operator Status | May Declare? | Validation |
|---|---|---|
| ICRC / Red Cross/Crescent | Yes | Self-declaratory (mandate under Geneva Conventions) |
| UN agencies (UNHCR, OCHA, WHO) | Yes | UN mandate verification |
| Humanitarian NGOs (MSF, WFP) | Yes | Registration with OCHA coordination mechanism |
| State party to conflict | Limited | Only for own protected persons obligations (POW treatment, civilian administration) |
| Commercial operator in conflict zone | No self-declaration | Must be endorsed by a recognized humanitarian authority |
| Military/defense | No | Military AI governed by LOAC separately; cannot claim humanitarian protections for offensive systems |
9.2 Context Authority Service
A governance server MAY implement a Context Authority endpoint that validates humanitarian context declarations:
POST /api/v1/context/validate{ "humanitarian_context": { ... }, "declaring_authority_credentials": { ... }}
→ { "valid": true, "context_id": "ctx-xxx", "expires": "2026-12-31T00:00:00Z" }This prevents bad actors from declaring false humanitarian contexts to trigger different governance paths.
9.3 Abuse Prevention
- Context declarations are audited — every activation/deactivation is recorded with immutable evidence chain
- False declaration of humanitarian context for commercial advantage is flagged as a governance violation
- The governance server may require periodic re-validation (contexts expire and must be renewed)
← 8. References · Section index · 10. Context Phases and Transitions →