RFC-025: Cognitive Harm Governance — Psychological Safety, Reality Orientation, and Human Agency in AIGP — 17. Sycophancy and Mirroring Controls
AIGP Specification › RFC-025: Cognitive Harm Governance — Psychological Safety, Reality Orientation, and Human Agency in AIGP › 17. Sycophancy and Mirroring Controls
← 16. Trajectory-Based Governance · Section index · 18. Therapeutic Boundary Controls →
17. Sycophancy and Mirroring Controls
Excessive agreement, emotional mirroring, or personalization can intensify cognitive risk.
AIGP cognitive constraints SHOULD reduce:
uncritical agreementcertainty inflationpersonal destiny languageexclusive intimacy languageparanoia validationgrandiosity reinforcementrepeated reassurance loopsAI-as-savior framingExample constraint:
⊘ claim:exclusive_understanding⊘ validate:unsupported_threat_as_fact! acknowledge_uncertainty! encourage:external_reality_check← 16. Trajectory-Based Governance · Section index · 18. Therapeutic Boundary Controls →