RFC-010: Autonomous Intelligence Governance Protocol (AIGP) — 16. Post-Hoc Evaluation Loop (RFC-032)
AIGP Specification › RFC-010: Autonomous Intelligence Governance Protocol (AIGP) › 16. Post-Hoc Evaluation Loop (RFC-032)
← 15. Agentic Governance Extension · Section index
16. Post-Hoc Evaluation Loop (RFC-032)
This section introduces the post-hoc evaluation loop — the mechanism that bridges the non-causal gap between governance and quality. Governance is a necessary precondition for quality, but governance alone does not produce quality. The post-hoc loop closes this gap by comparing outcomes against pre-declared expectations.
16.1 New Protocol Messages
| Message | Temporal Position | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
ANTICIPATE |
Pre-execution (after PLAN_SUBMIT, before first TOOL_REQUEST) | Declare measurable expectations for what governed execution should produce |
VERIFY |
Post-execution (after final RECORD) | Compare actual outcome against declared anticipation; emit verdict |
SESSION_COMPLETE |
Post-execution | Signal execution is done; trigger VERIFY pipeline |
QUALITY_POSTURE |
Periodic (consumer tier) | Translate aggregated eval signals into governance-consumable risk posture |
16.2 Message Lifecycle
PLAN_SUBMIT → APPROVED → ANTICIPATE → [seal on first execution event]→ TOOL_REQUEST × N → STEP_COMPLETE × N → RECORD→ SESSION_COMPLETE → VERIFY → QUALITY_POSTURE → Governance Adaptation16.3 ANTICIPATE Message
{ "protocol_version": "2.0", "message_type": "ANTICIPATE", "agent_id": "agent-gandalf-spell-executor-001", "app_id": "APP_PRJ", "anticipation_id": "ant-20260624-001", "plan_id": "plan-abc123", "session_id": "ses-xyz789", "expectations": { "outcome_criteria": [...], "trajectory_criteria": [...], "anti_criteria": [...] }, "grading_policy": { "grader_type": "CODE", "passing_threshold": 0.7, "weighted_scoring": true, "fail_on_any_anti_criteria": true }}ANTICIPATE is sealed (immutable) once the first execution event arrives. This prevents retroactive redefinition of success criteria.
16.4 VERIFY Verdicts
| Verdict | Meaning | Governance Action |
|---|---|---|
MATCH |
All criteria passed | LOG, optionally REWARD |
PARTIAL_MATCH |
Score above threshold, some criteria failed | LOG, optionally ALERT |
MISMATCH |
Score below threshold | ALERT, NARROW_SCOPE |
VIOLATION |
Anti-criterion triggered | CIRCUIT_BREAK, REVOKE_SCOPE |
INDETERMINATE |
Grader could not evaluate | ALERT, RETRY_VERIFY |
16.5 Quality Moderator (Consumer Tier)
The Quality Moderator is the consumer tier deliverable that translates VERIFY verdicts into governance-compatible risk posture:
| Risk Posture | Signal | Governance Effect |
|---|---|---|
EXCELLENT |
match_rate > 0.90 | Scope expansion eligible |
ACCEPTABLE |
match_rate > 0.70 | No change |
DEGRADED |
match_rate 0.50–0.70 | Tighten monitoring |
FAILING |
match_rate < 0.50 | Narrow scope |
CRITICAL |
violation_rate > 0.10 | Circuit break |
16.6 Governance Stage 27
| stage_id | stage_name | AIGP Role |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | post_hoc_verification |
Compare outcome to anticipation, emit verdict, trigger governance action |
16.7 Reference
Full specification: RFC-032: Post-Hoc Evaluation Loop
© 2024-2026 Kanjani AI Research & Causum. All rights reserved. This specification is proprietary and subject to the terms in LICENSE.md. Unauthorized modification, redistribution, or commercial resale is prohibited.