RFC-030: Japan AI Promotion Act — Innovation-Centric Governance — 7. Interaction with Other RFCs
AIGP Specification › RFC-030: Japan AI Promotion Act — Innovation-Centric Governance › 7. Interaction with Other RFCs
← 6. SDK Integration · Section index · 8. Gaps Addressed — Comparison with EU AI Act →
7. Interaction with Other RFCs
| RFC | Interaction with Japan AI Promotion Act |
|---|---|
| RFC-027 (IHL) | Japan’s defense sector AI must comply with IHL constraints; innovation-first does not override humanitarian law. |
| RFC-028 (EU AI Act) | Japanese AI systems serving EU market must meet EU requirements. JP approach is less restrictive — EU constraints layer on top when applicable. |
| RFC-029 (AU Strategy) | Complementary: Japan’s innovation-enablement can support AU’s development goals. Hiroshima Process INCLUSIVE_AI maps to AU’s inclusion principle. |
| RFC-026 (Feedback) | Feedback mechanisms align with transparency obligation (JP-002); citizen literacy (JP-003) ensures meaningful feedback participation. |
| RFC-024 (D-DNA) | Data lineage supports transparency and safety evidence requirements without prohibitive overhead. |
← 6. SDK Integration · Section index · 8. Gaps Addressed — Comparison with EU AI Act →