RFC-038: Domain of Concern Registry — AIGP Dialects as First-Class Artifacts — 15. Second-Order Dialect Evolution
AIGP Specification › RFC-038: Domain of Concern Registry — AIGP Dialects as First-Class Artifacts › 15. Second-Order Dialect Evolution
← 14. Compatibility and Migration · Section index · 16. Security and Safety Considerations →
15. Second-Order Dialect Evolution
15.1 Empirical Dialect Improvement
A dialect is not a fixed standard. It is a living observation apparatus that evolves from its own empirical results. RFC-035 §2.2 establishes second-order criterion evolution — the system generates new observation criteria from its own empirical history.
At the dialect level, this manifests as:
| Signal | Dialect Evolution Response |
|---|---|
| A variable produces no gaps across N evaluations | The variable may not capture the construct it claims to. Investigate or remove (MAJOR). |
| A variable always produces gaps (100% MISMATCH) | The threshold may be miscalibrated, or the variable measures something every system fails. Recalibrate (MINOR) or redefine (MAJOR). |
| A new concern pattern emerges not captured by existing variables | A new variable is needed. Add (MINOR). |
| Observer disagreement is high on a specific variable | The extraction method may be ambiguous. Refine (PATCH) or restructure (MINOR). |
| Cross-organizational comparison reveals systematic divergence | The dialect may have insufficient specificity. Consider derived dialects for sub-populations. |
15.2 Evolution Governance
Dialect evolution is not automatic. It is governed:
- Longitudinal verdict data is accumulated (RFC-032 behavioral baselines)
- Statistical signals are detected (variable-level gap distributions)
- Evolution proposals are submitted (structured change requests to the registry)
- Peer review evaluates the proposal against construct validity
- New version is published if review passes
- Subscribers are notified; migration path is documented
This mirrors the scientific cycle: accumulate evidence → propose theory revision → peer review → publish → community adoption.
← 14. Compatibility and Migration · Section index · 16. Security and Safety Considerations →