Skip to content

RFC-028: EU AI Act Alignment — Regulatory Governance Framework — 2. Regulatory Context Declaration

AIGP SpecificationRFC-028: EU AI Act Alignment — Regulatory Governance Framework › 2. Regulatory Context Declaration

← 1. Problem Statement · Section index · 3. Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) — Non-Derogable Rules →

2. Regulatory Context Declaration

2.1 Protocol Extension

Analogous to RFC-027’s humanitarian_context:

{
"regulatory_context": {
"active": true,
"framework": "EU_AI_ACT",
"risk_classification": "HIGH_RISK",
"annex_iii_category": "8a",
"deployer_jurisdiction": "EU",
"provider_jurisdiction": "US",
"conformity_status": "ASSESSED",
"eu_database_registered": true,
"declaration_date": "2026-06-17T00:00:00Z"
}
}

2.2 Risk Classification Levels

UNACCEPTABLE → PROHIBITED (Art. 5 — cannot be deployed)
HIGH_RISK → Full governance requirements (Art. 6-49)
LIMITED_RISK → Transparency requirements (Art. 50)
MINIMAL_RISK → Voluntary codes of practice
GPAI → General-Purpose AI model obligations (Art. 51-56)
GPAI_SYSTEMIC → GPAI with systemic risk (>10^25 FLOPs)

2.3 Annex III Categories (High-Risk Areas)

Category Domain Examples
1 Biometrics Remote biometric identification, emotion recognition
2 Critical infrastructure Management/operation of digital infrastructure, road traffic, water/gas/heating/electricity
3 Education & vocational training Determining access, evaluating learning outcomes, monitoring prohibited behavior during exams
4 Employment & workers management CV sorting, job advertisements, performance evaluation, promotion decisions
5 Essential services access Credit scoring, insurance pricing, emergency service dispatch
6 Law enforcement Individual risk assessment, polygraphs, evidence analysis, profiling
7 Migration, asylum, border control Document authenticity, risk assessment, identification
8 Justice & democratic processes Fact-finding for judicial decisions, election influence


← 1. Problem Statement · Section index · 3. Prohibited Practices (Art. 5) — Non-Derogable Rules →