RFC-035: Mediation Vector Profile — A Validity-Aware Measurement Model for Domains of Concern — 5. The Mediation Vector Profile: A Four-Layer Model
AIGP Specification › RFC-035: Mediation Vector Profile — A Validity-Aware Measurement Model for Domains of Concern › 5. The Mediation Vector Profile: A Four-Layer Model
← 4. Measurement Science Foundation: A Concern Vector Is a Measurement Claim · Section index · 6. Structural Parallel →
5. The Mediation Vector Profile: A Four-Layer Model
The combined force of the measurement science above is that a Mediation Vector must not be a flat vector. It must be a profile with four layers, each answering a distinct question:
graph TD L1[Layer 1: Construct<br/>What concern is being measured?] --> L2[Layer 2: Evidence<br/>What evidence is admissible?] L2 --> L3[Layer 3: Measurement<br/>What variables, typed, normalized, warranted?] L3 --> L4[Layer 4: Calculation<br/>How may RFC-036 compute concern posture?]| Layer | Question | Defines | Source Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Construct | What concern is being measured? | concern_id, construct_definition, observable_indicators, measurement_assumptions, known_invalid_uses | Construct validity (Cronbach & Meehl; Messick) |
| 2. Evidence | What evidence is admissible? | admissible_evidence_types, admissibility_levels, provenance_requirements | W3C PROV; AIGP D-DNA |
| 3. Measurement | What variables, how typed, normalized, warranted? | variable declarations with type, scale, allowed_operations, extraction, uncertainty, warrant | Measurement theory (Stevens); GQM (Basili); Toulmin |
| 4. Calculation | How may concern posture be computed? | aggregation rules, hard-stops, weights, handoff to RFC-036 | Decision analysis (deferred to RFC-036) |
A profile is incomplete if any layer is absent. A vector without a construct layer measures nothing defined. A vector without an evidence layer measures without grounding. A vector without a measurement layer permits bad math. A vector without a calculation layer cannot produce posture.
5.1 The Admissibility Rule
The governing constraint, stated normatively:
A variable MUST NOT participate in empirical concern calculation unless its value, type, admissible evidence source, extraction method, provenance, uncertainty, and allowed mathematical operations are declared.
This single rule is what separates a measurement profile from a scoring heuristic.
← 4. Measurement Science Foundation: A Concern Vector Is a Measurement Claim · Section index · 6. Structural Parallel →