RFC-031: Universal Humanity AI Governance — The Capstone Unification — 3. Governance Evaluation Order
AIGP Specification › RFC-031: Universal Humanity AI Governance — The Capstone Unification › 3. Governance Evaluation Order
← 2. Universal Principles · Section index · 4. Context Declaration: universal_context →
3. Governance Evaluation Order
When multiple jurisdictional frameworks apply simultaneously, AIGP resolves conflicts through a strict evaluation order based on the severity of harm principle:
```mermaidflowchart TD REQ[/"Request arrives"/] --> IHL{"1. IHL<br/>(RFC-027)"} IHL -->|"Life/death contexts"| IHL_DENY[DENY] IHL -->|Pass| EU{"2. EU AI Act<br/>(RFC-028)"} EU -->|"Rights/prohibition"| EU_DENY[DENY] EU -->|Pass| AU{"3. AU Strategy<br/>(RFC-029)"} AU -->|"Development/sovereignty"| AU_DENY[DENY] AU -->|Pass| JP{"4. Japan Act<br/>(RFC-030)"} JP -->|"Innovation/promotion"| JP_DENY[DENY] JP -->|Pass| UH{"5. Universal<br/>(RFC-031)"} UH -->|"Baseline governance"| UH_DENY[DENY] UH -->|Pass| ALLOW[ALLOW]
style IHL fill:#d32f2f,color:#fff style EU fill:#1565c0,color:#fff style AU fill:#2e7d32,color:#fff style JP fill:#e65100,color:#fff style UH fill:#6a1b9a,color:#fff style ALLOW fill:#1b5e20,color:#fff style IHL_DENY fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff style EU_DENY fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff style AU_DENY fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff style JP_DENY fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff style UH_DENY fill:#b71c1c,color:#fff3.1 Precedence Logic
The evaluation order reflects a hierarchy of consequences:
-
IHL takes absolute precedence because it governs contexts where human life is immediately at risk. No other governance concern outweighs the protection of persons in armed conflict. If
ihl_contextis active, IHL rules override all others. -
EU AI Act is second because it embodies binding legal obligations with enforcement mechanisms (fines up to 7% of global turnover). Where EU law applies, its prohibitions and requirements cannot be overridden by softer frameworks.
-
AU Continental AI Strategy is third because it represents the sovereignty rights of 1.4 billion people and addresses structural inequity. Where African context is declared, development and sovereignty protections apply.
-
Japan AI Promotion Act is fourth because it represents a legitimate innovation-enabling framework. Where Japanese context is declared, promotion-first governance applies — but cannot override protections from higher-precedence frameworks.
-
Universal Defaults (this RFC) apply when NO jurisdictional context is declared, or when the specific situation is not addressed by any active jurisdictional framework.
3.2 Multi-Context Resolution
When multiple contexts are simultaneously active:
IF ihl_context.active THEN APPLY RFC-027 rules FIRST FOR remaining decisions: cascade to next applicable frameworkELSE IF eu_context.active THEN APPLY RFC-028 rules FIRST FOR remaining decisions: cascadeELSE IF african_context.active THEN APPLY RFC-029 rules FIRST FOR remaining decisions: cascadeELSE IF japanese_context.active THEN APPLY RFC-030 rules FIRST FOR remaining decisions: cascadeELSE APPLY Universal Defaults (UH-001 through UH-010)END IF3.3 Conflict Resolution
When two active frameworks produce contradictory requirements:
- The higher-precedence framework’s rule applies
- The conflict is LOGGED as a governance event
- The lower-precedence framework’s requirement is recorded as a DEVIATION
- A governance review is TRIGGERED to assess whether the conflict represents a structural problem
Example: An AI system operating in both EU and Japanese contexts encounters a decision where the EU AI Act would prohibit an action (high-risk classification) but the Japan Act would permit it (innovation-enabling). Resolution: EU prohibition applies (higher precedence), deviation from Japanese innovation intent is logged, and a governance review evaluates whether alternative approaches can satisfy both.
← 2. Universal Principles · Section index · 4. Context Declaration: universal_context →